Automated urinalysis: First experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting All reports generated by an IRIS urine analyzer are provided with quantitative documentation. This allows for greater ability for doctors to detect pathogens in the urinary tract and also monitor the progression of treatment. Finally, our customers find the IRIS urinalysis analyzer to be an intuitive and easy to use system in any lab. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Comparison of Automated and Manual Methods for Urinalysis | The authors compared results for accuracy and precision obtained by a semiautomated prototype In today's era of automation and Lean Six Sigma processes in laboratory medicine, the manual urinalysis test may be ready for a major makeover. Such a development would be welcome because, in the typical American hospital, the clinical laboratory performs an average of 120 urinalyses per day. Some Myco offers top quality used and refurbished medical equipment at great prices. Call us today with any questions or if we can help - 800.414.7169. Introduction. Urine screening is achieved by either automated or manual microscopic analysis. The aim of the study was to compare Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 urine analyzers, and manual urine microscopic analysis. Urinalysis is a high-volume procedure that currently requires significant labor to examine microscopic sediment. We evaluated the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer for performing this task. Instrument accuracy was assessed by comparing continuous counts of microscopic elements from the UF-100 with ranges of cells (per low-power field or high-power field) from manual microscopy Iris Diagnostics, a division of IRIS International Inc, manufactures and sells urinalysis workcells for use in physician offices, hospitals and commercial laboratories worldwide. These workcells perform both urine chemistry and